FIFO (Fly-In-Fly-Out) workers are voicing frustration over soaring prices at remote sites, with many feeling they’re being taken advantage of.
“$24 for a 4-pack of mid-strength beer? Are you having a laugh?!” This outcry reflects a broader dissatisfaction among workers facing steep costs for basic items while away from home.
There is also concern that some camps are profiteering from these high prices. “Camps seem to be taking advantage of the situation, which wasn’t the original arrangement,” another worker noted.
Skyrocketing Prices and Uncontrolled Costs
It’s not just the beer that’s causing outrage. Workers are reporting exorbitant prices for basic goods:
- $15 for a packet of Lemsip
- $9 for a large packet of chips
- $12 for a can of deodorant, which was on sale for $8
- $5.20 can of mid strength beer
- $12 for a pack of Tim Tams
- $10 for a block of chocolate
One worker said, “$15 for 4 beers? It’s not just about the beer; it’s about everything. Some camps still charge reasonable amounts, but others are clearly profiteering.”
“A block of mid-strength beer that costs around $55 is being sold for over $170 a box. That’s a significant markup,” said another FIFO worker. “These prices are a clear attempt to maximise profits at the expense of workers. It’s unfair given the challenging conditions we work under,” another worker stated.
Behind the Price Hikes
The situation is further complicated by the way price increases are implemented. “Some companies phase in price increases gradually to avoid a large shock to customers. Suppliers might also raise their prices based on contract terms,” explained a worker familiar with the industry practices.
Calls for Company Intervention
Some workers are suggesting that mining companies should step in to address this issue. “Really, the shops should be subsidised by the mining company. We shouldn’t be paying more than we would back in the city,” one worker commented. The idea is that companies should help mitigate the high costs of living in remote areas to make FIFO work more sustainable.
While it’s understandable that goods might be slightly more expensive in remote locations due to transportation and logistics, the current price hikes are seen as excessive. Workers are not opposed to paying a bit more for convenience, but the sharp increases are perceived as unfair and exploitative.
Moving Forward
As FIFO workers continue to voice their concerns, it remains to be seen if there will be any changes. Addressing these issues could significantly impact worker satisfaction. For now, the debate continues on how best to balance fair pricing with the realities of remote work environments.
Got a story to share? Reach out to us! Scroll down to leave a comment below.
I’m seeing people complain about Alcohol prices, that’s the least of my worrys. A return flight from Brisbane to Emerald is roughly $1500-1800 return, absolutely disgusting for a 1 hour flight.
It’s a fucking joke
Lol, I pay 700-800 eveey other fortnight return to Philippines
If a company expects employees to work in such remote locations why can’t they set up a camp fully covered by the company it’s not like they wouldn’t be a tax right off anyway
Try living in these towns. Because mines pay big money for rentals to house their people it drives up the price of rentals for those who live and work in these areas. To be at home with the kids d partners after work. Then add the the cost of groceries and essentials inthese small towns because there is no competition. It’s a joke…. and makes life hard for us every day people
The camp shops and the wet mess used to be cheaper than what you payed in the city. It’s just more money grabbing.